Results 1 to 10 of 78

Thread: Lowering the crossover point.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Hostboard Member GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26th, 2002
    Location
    Chamblee, Ga.
    Posts
    4,967
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    48 Post(s)

    Re: Lowering the crossover point.

    Quote Originally Posted by aditya View Post
    Yes GM, the BL data particularly seems to be in what unit, W/M ?

    'n' is also pretty close.

    Actually these readings were taken at around the same time when Thiele's papers were published in the AES journals, and I am sure but not able to recollect now, that these measurements were taken either by Thiele himself or somebody pretty well known in the industry. I am still searching for the source where I had found it.
    My notes are gone, but I want to say weber/meter, but I find no such conversion nor newton/amp for that matter.

    'n' ? what's this?

    It was a Prof. Ashley and I got them from the late Bill Eckle via the local Altec distributor way before the WWW became available to the masses and is still available on his website in memorium: ASHLEY

    GM
    Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.

  2. #2
    Senior Hostboard Member aditya's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 5th, 2009
    Posts
    175
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Lowering the crossover point.

    Quote Originally Posted by GM View Post
    My notes are gone, but I want to say weber/meter, but I find no such conversion nor newton/amp for that matter.

    'n' ? what's this?

    It was a Prof. Ashley and I got them from the late Bill Eckle via the local Altec distributor way before the WWW became available to the masses and is still available on his website in memorium: ASHLEY

    GM

    Yes....weber/meter it is, used to be used earlier. 'Newton-per-Amp' is the same as 'Tesla-meter'. But I had just plugged a standard value to try the driver out, and finally found a value which had made the sim-ing work.

    By 'n' I meant 'eta', for efficiency.

    Another 'yes' for you as usual, for the info about the source of the t/s parameters. Many thanks.

    Regards
    Aditya

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 23904699 times.